Alex wrote:
Unfourtionaly, in America, more and more people are moving up to white collar jobs and leaving behind organized labor in pursuit of personal gains.
To the degree that service jobs are "white collar" jobs, yes, that's true. But the vast majority of service sector jobs are lower paying than factory jobs and with fewer benefits. Wal-Mart has set the trend for the industry, unfortunately. My closest friend growing up is in the grocery workers union in California, which is being broken up as the big grocery chains cry that to compete with Wal-Mart Super Centers (the ones with grocery stores in them), they need to severely reduce pay and benefits to compete. The new labor agreement was a major retreat in that direction.
Alex wrote:
Weakness in unions will either further accentuate the growing divide between the rich and the poor in this country, or become a nonissue as the vast majority of americans prosper.
There's no doubt that a growing number of Americans are prospering in the "new economy", but that the vast majority of Americans are actually going backwards. Job security is disappearing, as is the guarantee of decent health benefits, for the vast majority. If you own a lot of stock or if you're a CEO in a large company, you're probably doing quite well. Moving jobs to China and India, for example, really helps the bottom line for many companies. But it's a negative factor for the people whose jobs get replaced and for the growing number threatened with future job losses.
Alex wrote:
Meanwhile, the time for organized labor is long overdue in developing countries with lots of manufacturing such as India, Malasia, and especialy China.
What happened in Korea heartens me. When Hyundai workers started realizing just how wildly successful their company had become, they demanded and got much better pay and benefits. I expect that to happen in India as well. But China? Good luck. The last vestiges of communism there are all about keeping workers in line, aren't they? How ironic.
Alex wrote:
I just wish we could get someone who cares about people (not money) in the whitehouse

Amen to that. They're just better at connecting to the electorate than we've been so far. That's a fixable problem that needs to be urgently addressed. And I think those of us into ska have a unique perspective on that battle, seeing how we seem good at taking underground music and making it work for mainstream tastes. Maybe ska needs to be the new music for the working people, which needs to include everyone in the service sector.
BTW, you'd be surprised how many ska bands worldwide talk about these things. They call themselves "skactiviste".
