AskTheMagic8Ball wrote:
So, checkers are supposed to be a representation of racial unity, and on the surface that makes sense right?
Look again though. In reality, the checkers are segregated. Black is separated from white and white from black. They are not actually united, they are in their distinct boxes. If interpretted incorrectly, it could actually seem like checkers are representing segregation rather than unity.
Huh????? The black and white are intertwined EQUALLY. The only other way to represent what you're saying is to go to grey, which is to blur any distinction of black or white at all. While there is certainly an argument to be made for no racial distinctions, it tends to be highly muted because its all too often an argument made by the dominant group to justify pretending other groups don't exist.
When true unity exists, then the distinctions won't matter. But we're quite a ways from that yet ...
Mike wrote:
To me it is basically you can dislike somebody, buy you don't do it because of rascism, sexism or any of that. I am not going to like everybody, or even most people, but I will do it because they are annoying, stupid or just plain suck, not because they are black.
I think the important dividing line here is between LIKING and RESPECT. You can dislike someone for almost any reason, but still respect them as a fellow human being.
Does that make any sense?